<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: • Halfway House For Telecommuters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://undress4success.com/halfway-house-telecommuters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://undress4success.com/halfway-house-telecommuters/</link>
	<description>Home Based Business, Work At Home, and Freelance Job Advice</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Harnish</title>
		<link>http://undress4success.com/halfway-house-telecommuters/comment-page-1/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Harnish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undress4success.com/?p=452#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>Yup, that's what I thought you meant, Michael. By shared I meant several companies under one roof, as you do.

I'm intrigued by the idea, but still puzzled why the same level of support and security, the same kind of infrastructure can't be provided on a one-to-one basis instead of for groups.

And I don't mean I'm puzzled in an argumentative way. I mean it in a purely technical sense. Why can't, for example, a &lt;a href="http://www.citrix.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Citrix&lt;/a&gt; suite of appliances do the same thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, that&#8217;s what I thought you meant, Michael. By shared I meant several companies under one roof, as you do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m intrigued by the idea, but still puzzled why the same level of support and security, the same kind of infrastructure can&#8217;t be provided on a one-to-one basis instead of for groups.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m puzzled in an argumentative way. I mean it in a purely technical sense. Why can&#8217;t, for example, a <a href="http://www.citrix.com/" rel="nofollow">Citrix</a> suite of appliances do the same thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.903 seconds -->
